Okay all you theologians, literature
enthusiasts and C.S. Lewis scholars….I need your help reconciling a theological
allegory in Lewis’ book The Last Battle in
the Chronicles of Narnia series.
Even if you’re not a theologian, literature
enthusiast or C.S. Lewis scholar, that’s okay! If you have a perspective to
help me understand what I’m about to ask, then by all means, contribute!
(Spoiler alert! If you haven’t
read the books and don’t want the ending spoiled for you, then you might not
want to read on. )
I need to presume some allegorical
connections that I infer C.S. Lewis meant before I ask my question:
Aslan
resembles Jesus. The idea of Tash takes after Satan.
Aslan’s country is heaven. Yes? This is what I’ve concluded.
Aslan’s country is heaven. Yes? This is what I’ve concluded.
Disclaimer/Qualifer/Addendum: Keep in mind that the thoughts that follow
below are not intended to imply that we can earn our way to heaven by doing
good deeds. I understand that we don’t earn heaven, but that it’s by God grace
through Jesus Christ that we can confidently come into His presence. This is
important to remember when reading what I have to say.
Towards the end of Lewis’ book The Last Battle in the chapter Further Up and Further In, the world of
Narnia has just ended. It was destroyed by Aslan himself. After Aslan separated
the creatures (to the right and left) and the world is ended. Peter, Edmund,
Lucy, Digory, Polly, Eustace and Jill , who travelled to Narnia in previous
Narnia books, are in Aslan’s country
with other Narnian creatures Aslan allowed in.
Another creature, a man, made it into Aslan’s
world also. He’s from Calormen, a place neighboring Narnia and follows the god,
Tash. Everything he ever did was for Tash. He came with his fellow countrymen
to conquer Narnia. And somehow he made it into Aslan’s world.
C.S. Lewis’
theology disguised in the conversation below is what I’m struggling with. It
goes something like this:
“…I have
served Tash all my days and not him [Aslan],” Emeth, the Calormen, says to Peter, Lucy and
everyone else there, recounting his encounter with Aslan when Emeth entered
through the small door to Aslan’s country as Narnia was ending.
“Son, thou
art welcome [into Aslan’s country],” says Aslan.
“Alas, Lord,
I am no son of thine but the servant of Tash.”
“Child, all
the service thou hast done to Tash, I account as service done to me.”
“Is it true
then that thou and Tash are one?” The Lion growled so that the earth shook…and
said, “It is false. Not because he and I are one, but because we are
opposites—I take to me the services which thou hast done to him. For I and he
are of such different kinds that no service which is vile can be done to me,
and none which is not vile can be done to him. Therefore, if any man swear by
Tash and keep his oath for the oath’s sake, it is by me that he has truly
sworn, though he know it not, and it is I who reward him. And if any man do a
cruelty in my name, then, though he says the name Aslan, it is Tash by whom he
serves and by Tash his deed is accepted.”
To be
objective first, what is your perspective of this conversation?
What is
Lewis trying to communicate to the reader here? Really, think about this before you read on.
I don’t want your perspective to be tainted by mine.
My struggle
is this: It seems that Lewis is saying
that one can serve Satan (Tash) by doing good deeds and it be credited to God/Jesus
(Aslan).
I know
that God can credit anything he wants. And I know that it’s not by our good
deeds that we earn heaven.
I get that.
Emeth then says, “Yet I have been seeking Tash all my days.” [He still acknowledges
serving another god.]
“Beloved,
unless thy desire has been for me thou wouldst not have sought so long and so
truly. For all find what they truly seek,” replied Aslan.
So if this foreigner was following Tash all
his life and didn’t even acknowledge the existence of Aslan, how does he get
into Aslan’s world? Emeth admitted
twice to only serving Tash!
The Bible says:
21“Not everyone
who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who
does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to
me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name
drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell
them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
~Matthew 7:21-23
NIV
How then can
one do good deeds, not know Jesus and go to heaven? This seems to be what Lewis implies in the
above conversation. I know a lot of good people who do a lot of good that don’t
know Jesus, but from my understanding of the Bible, being “good” and doing good
doesn’t qualify you to get you into heaven. Jesus does. And having a
relationship with Him is key.
I can’t think of a scripture to
reference that indicates that those serving Satan and doing “good” will get
into heaven. I believe that Satan is capable of doing good deeds. He
masquerades as an angel of light. Does that mean he’ll get to go to heaven? I
believe that he twists the truth just enough that it’s believable enough for
people to follow, but they’re not following God.
Eve ate the fruit in the garden. Like the
Pharisees in Jesus’ time. They thought that what they were doing was God’s
will. And yet they committed murder in the name of God. They lied. Some
probably put power as their “god”. The Spanish Inquisition was done in the name
of God. The Crusades were done in the name of God. Killing in the name of God.
All because they said their purpose was to serve God when in reality I
think it was to quench their own desires for greed and power. They can say and
even believe their purpose is right, but if it goes against God’s Word, then
they’re the ones in error. Not God. God knows our hearts, what’s truly in them.
But I digress.
It seems to
me that Lewis is implying that one can serve another “god”, or Satan as the
allegory implies, and still go to heaven. Is this a reasonable conclusion for the
allegory? And I don’t mean that one can serve another “god”, then later serve
God and go to heaven—because that is not the impression Lewis seems to be
giving here. There is no indication that Emeth ever chose to seek and serve
Aslan.
If this is not the correct interpretation,
then please help me to understand the theology Lewis is trying to convey in
this conversation between Aslan and Emeth. Really. Because I like C.S. Lewis. I’ve
loved the theology he’s included in the whole Narnia series. And I don’t want
to not like him based on this one part of his book if this is the theology he’s
trying to convey to the reader. I just don’t agree with that theology.
Again, I ramble.
I don’t
understand how if I choose to serve Satan (or other “gods”, or myself as my own
“god”, money as my “god”, etc.) how those good deeds in that service equate
service to God. I know
there is only one God, Jehovah. And I know that many people follow Satan in
different forms and most don’t even know it or believe that they are. So if I
don’t believe or know that there’s One True God and I do good works and I never
seek Him, how then does that “allow” me into heaven? (Again, our works don’t
get us into heaven.)
Even if I was seeking “a higher power” or a
“spiritual being”, but have no relationship with God, how does that get me into
heaven?
And yes, I know God can do anything. But I
also believe that He has “conditions”. Our God loves unconditionally. Yes. No matter
what bad things we’ve done, He loves us and wants us in a relationship with
Him. But there are “conditions” for a relationship with Him. Sure.
We must meet Him. Get to know Him. Obey Him.
Have faith in Him. Keep trying to follow Him. Believe in Jesus. Praise Him.
Honor people—especially fellow believers. But it is still by His grace that He
lets us into His presence and into heaven. It’s not a game or a race. It’s not
about “Who knows God best”. God wants
us all there. He wants us to choose Him and to serve Him. It’s not
about our perfection, rather about His. Jesus makes us perfect because we
can never be perfect. And God demands perfection. That’s why He sent Jesus to
satisfy His wrath through perfect obedience to the Law and to sacrifice His
life to pay the price, which is death.
Steve says it’s just a fictional story. Yes,
I agree. But I think we must also agree that Lewis wrote this story with metaphorical
references to Jesus, heaven and the Bible~that there is a message Lewis wanted to share with his readers.
Yes?
Well, I think so. If you don’t, then we can
sit down together and discuss it.
So, what do you think? Am I correct in what
Lewis seems to be implying? Do you have some other insight that may help with
my perspective of this conversation and theology Lewis seems to be implying? I
am having a difficult time reconciling this section of his book with what the
Bible teaches.
I welcome your thoughts. Don’t hold back. But
be gentle. J